home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Collection of Internet
/
Collection of Internet.iso
/
infosrvr
/
dev
/
www_talk.930
/
000994_timbl@www3.cern.ch _Thu Apr 29 13:59:05 1993.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-01-24
|
1KB
Return-Path: <timbl@www3.cern.ch>
Received: from dxmint.cern.ch by nxoc01.cern.ch (NeXT-1.0 (From Sendmail 5.52)/NeXT-2.0)
id AA03855; Thu, 29 Apr 93 13:59:05 MET DST
Received: from www3.cern.ch by dxmint.cern.ch (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
id AA20757; Thu, 29 Apr 1993 14:19:32 +0200
Received: by www3.cern.ch (NX5.67c/NX3.0S)
id AA08424; Thu, 29 Apr 93 14:15:25 +0100
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 93 14:15:25 +0100
From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@www3.cern.ch>
Message-Id: <9304291315.AA08424@www3.cern.ch>
Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.87.1)
Received: by NeXT Mailer (1.87.1)
To: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Subject: HMML -- More character entities?
Cc: TOM.R2D2@law.mail.cornell.edu
Reply-To: timbl@nxoc01.cern.ch
Tom Bruce broght up the question of allowing
entities for more than the ISOLatin1 set.
Anyone care to take on defining a reasonable set?
(Like not all unicode?)
We would need
names from some standard,
suggested translations into latin 1 equivalents
for those without them?)
Tom's initial need was for section sign, pilcrow (paragraph mark),
mu and a few other Greek characters in common use outside Greek,
and the registered and copyright signs.
I am usingthe term "HMML" to refer to the next DTD following on from
HTML, to distinguidsh from HTML which I think should stick at latin1
for the sake of stability.
Tim